My friend and I were chatting for quite some time today morning. Among many other things, we talked about why Christ was not born on Jan 1st, how almost all cultures have 7 days in a week, significance of palm-up, palm-down and fingers in putting ‘tALa’ in Indian music, theory behind naming ‘saMpoorNa rAgAs’ in carnatic music etc. Our final topic revolved around something which was nothing. If you are visiting my blog, then I am sure you won’t be bored 😉 Enjoy!!!
HE[11:47 AM]:there is a book called Godel-Escher-Bach
HE[11:47 AM]:explains the similarities between Math/Painter/Musician minds
ME[11:47 AM]:yeah I have heard about that…..
HE[11:48 AM]:not easy to understand unless it is studied, especially Bach
ME[11:48 AM]:Bhyrappa was arguing the other day that to be a writer you need to be more intelligent than to be a painter or a musician and a lot of people agreed…I too tend to agree
HE[11:48 AM]:Escher’s paintings are nothing but certain math-transforms on a painting in a particular order
HE[11:49 AM]:what is more intelligent, what is less?
ME[11:49 AM]:OK, now we are into philosophy…..lol
ME[11:49 AM]:if not, at least we are going to define abstract
HE[11:49 AM]:no, Im saying it is not very smart to discuss those things
ME[11:50 AM]:not smart to discuss, yes
ME[11:50 AM]:not smart not to discuss as well
HE[11:50 AM]:someone will say a rocket-scientist is more intelligent than say, a composer
ME[11:50 AM]:at least at a superficial level, it’s easy to define, I would think
HE[11:50 AM]:I just think it is stupid
HE[11:50 AM]:very superficial
ME[11:50 AM]:true, but closer to reality, isn’t it?
HE[11:50 AM]:and just for saying sake
ME[11:50 AM]:not true…I disagree
ME[11:51 AM]:Something which touches more people is more important…..
ME[11:51 AM]:Unfortunate rule…but hey tell that to Darwin…who pretty much messed it up for all of us
HE[11:51 AM]:a writer needs life experience and content and musician has content available, in that way, yes
ME[11:52 AM]:A doctor is as (perhaps more) important than a Hollywood actor…but who is more famous and ‘successful’?
HE[11:52 AM]:successful or not is easy. Tell me who is more intelligent
ME[11:53 AM]:now, you are talking Bhyrappa…..at least to a certain degree
HE[11:53 AM]:it may not be always right to say doctor is more intelligent than an actor
ME[11:53 AM]:sure enough…I agree
ME[11:53 AM]:So, then all human beings are , shall I say ‘victims’ of circumstances
HE[11:53 AM]:Im saying Byrappa had a very subjective line of thought which I wouldnt want to venture
ME[11:54 AM]:I thought it was quite abstract actually…he didn’t get deeper into it….but still….
HE[11:55 AM]:‘victims’ is not exactly correct, conservative word
ME[11:55 AM]:conservative..really? So, what would a liberal mind say?
HE[11:55 AM]:exactly, for saying sake….
HE[11:55 AM]:liberal mind would say….
ME[11:56 AM]:Ummmm…no…If every human being is a ‘victim’ then there is no ‘victim’ per today’s definition
HE[11:56 AM]:….fruits of circumstance
HE[11:56 AM]:or flowers of circumstance
ME[11:56 AM]:LOL….as GSS says you are calling a conservative a Philosopher and a liberal a poet
HE[11:57 AM]:no
HE[11:57 AM]:most liberals may be poets and most conservatives may be phils, but what I said is independent of that
ME[11:58 AM]:By that definition, my take was that of a philosopher and not conservative…
ME[11:58 AM]:Now, I am content…
ME[11:58 AM]:so that makes me a liberal
ME[11:58 AM]:and I ‘could’ be a poet
ME[11:58 AM]:So, that’s good
HE[11:58 AM]:everyone is here for a purpose for him to fulfill, so a ‘flower’ is a much better word
HE[11:59 AM]:didnt you say ‘victims’?
ME[11:59 AM]:But, didn’t I just prove that I could be a poet?
HE[11:59 AM]:how?
HE[11:59 AM]:not that Im refuting your claim but I didnt understand how
ME[11:59 AM]:Philosophers can use the term ‘victims’
ME[12:00 PM]:I used it in a broader sense where everyone is a ‘victim’…so it really loses the true meaning……it becomes a grand equalizer
ME[12:00 PM]:thus, I am a liberal…
ME[12:00 PM]:and liberals could be poets….so I choose to be one
ME[12:00 PM]:There you go
HE[12:00 PM]:yes, ok
HE[12:00 PM]:correct!
Recent Comments